<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>CraigBlog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetAtom" />
  <icon>favicon.ico</icon>
  <updated>2008-08-19T11:59:31.446125-04:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Craig Boyd</name>
  </author>
  <subtitle>Slacking Off as a Form of Art</subtitle>
  <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/</id>
  <generator uri="http://dasblog.info/" version="2.1.8102.813">DasBlog</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Missing Walmart Trip</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/08/19/MissingWalmartTrip.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,5415f4dc-715a-45fd-9f88-c5c7537c71f4.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-18T23:33:21.218-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-19T11:59:31.446125-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
It seems like a while since I've posted a Wal-mart Experience update, so I thought
I'd take a moment and explain.  Since the baby's arrived, I think I've only been
to Wal-mart twice.  I wrote about one of them, and I was so tired I completely
forgot about the second one.  To be fair, it was pretty uneventful with relatively
short lines and only a few stinky people.  I did walk down to Wal-mart today
to pick up some low-carb lunch stuff and discovered something terribly interesting
about a North Raleigh Walmart...
</p>
        <p>
Since I was on the grocery side, I was looking for a lane in that section to go through. 
Every lane was backed up into the main aisle, so Jim (my co-worker) and I headed
down towards the other entrance to check out the lanes there.  We were able to
walk straight up to a self-checkout and we were out in less than 5 minutes (including
the walk to the far side and back).
</p>
        <p>
I'm not sure this had anything to do with Wal-mart at all, since they obviously had
enough open lanes to support the amount of customer traffic for that time of day. 
It does point to my previous points about how much people are like sheep.  As
always, follow this general rule:  If you see a large congregation of people,
head in the opposite direction.
</p>
        <p>
That advice would probably save your life in a zombie uprising.
</p>
        <p>
Craig 6, Walmart Experience 1
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=5415f4dc-715a-45fd-9f88-c5c7537c71f4" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is the DVR the cause or the symptom?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/08/06/IsTheDVRTheCauseOrTheSymptom.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,1f86d206-5fa4-42ca-bb78-881801f72740.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-08-06T07:43:56.312-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T07:43:56.3125-04:00</updated>
    <category term="General" label="General" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,General.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p class="blogContent">
        </p>
        <p>
I haven't had a lot of time to watch much TV lately – but when I do, I notice some
alarming trends.  It seems like everyone is using the same advertising agency
and all the agency is doing is saying "we've got a great tampon commercial – we'll
sell your tomato juice using that format".
</p>
        <p>
Remember when advertising was entertaining?  I can remember when catch-phrases
like "Where's the Beef" and "I've fallen and I can't get up" were embedded in the
national pop-culture – in fact, I bet if you're close to my age you STILL remember
those phrases and probably got a little half-smile when you read those lines. 
Now, all the advertising is the same.  It's boring, it's annoying, and in some
cases downright subversive.  For those of you who don't see this alarming pattern
let me lay it out for you:
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>Side-effects may include projectile leprosy</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
Everyone knows about this commercial.  It's the one that paints a pretty picture
of landscapes, walks through parks, people wearing light happy colors and directs
me to ask my doctor if "Damitol" is right for me, even though they haven't told me
what it actually does or in what circumstances asking my doctor about it would be
appropriate.  I don't want to be sitting in the office and say "so, Doc, you
say I've got terrible hemorrhoids, so is Cialis right for me?"  They are kind
enough to rapidly slam my face with a list of side effects that almost always include
some kind of oily discharge erupting from my rectum or a boner that could last most
of my waking day - like I need another one of those.
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>I love having my STD</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
I always imagined once you had herpes or one of those other untreatable lifelong STDs,
you just went off and joined a colony of like-genitaled individuals.  Then I
saw this commercial, and discovered women who have herpes like to ride bicycles, go
for long walks in the park, and have unprotected sex with dirty people.  I'm
so glad they're not letting the funk get them down, or stop them from continuing to
spread their legs and the funk.  I'm sure they're proud, but I don't want to
think about infected pubic areas while I'm trying to have dinner.
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>Children are smarter than parents</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
I first noticed this one when the little girl told her mom in that stupid garble text
message speech that "OMG NBD", and the mom just acted like she didn't quite know what
to do.  I have a suggestion…take the child's cell phone, beat her with it, and
cancel the plan – taking the termination fee out of the savings you'll gain by not
buying her anymore trendy clothes and gadgets, and by not letting her out of the house. 
Heck, teach her to cook so you can enjoy an afternoon nap while she gets dinner ready.
</p>
        <p>
They kicked it up a notch with the seven year old who told his dad instead of checking
out the tree house his dad just built, he'd rather sit in the van and let the air
conditioner run so he and his little buddy could watch the built in DVD player WHILE
THEY'RE PLAYING A VIDEO GAME.  To make matters worse, the dad just closes the
door and lets the kid have his way.  
<br />
I'm afraid this commercial makes me angry because it's a little too close to the truth. 
Children run all over the top of their parents, and it does seem like the kids are
smarter than the parents…but that's only because the parents are stupid and too lazy
to straighten out that little misconception.  
</p>
        <p>
It's a simple equation folks:  1 hand + 1 bottom = a kid others don't mind being
around
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>Get a bigger wang and have sex whenever you want it</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
I'm blown away by the long reaching implications that a sizeable part of the population
needs medication or supplements to get a handle on their manhood.  I'm sure polling
would show a large majority of men are insecure about certain areas of their lives,
but diving deeper would demonstrate how overblown those fears are.  Maybe I'm
just not getting something, but long and the short of it is, no medicine or supplement
is going to get your more action - there's this other limiting factor called "women".
</p>
        <p>
And no, just taking a pill is not going to make me the talk of the town, unless it
makes me do strange things like go through the drive thru without a car and pants. 
I'm guessing that would probably get me noticed.
</p>
        <p>
Oh yeah, and if I'm taking medicine so I can have a moment with my wife, should we
be in separate bathtubs and outdoors?  What is this, some kind of hippie commune?
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>Regular birth control is anti-American, but STD vaccinations are totally cool</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
I'd never thought of it this way, but I'm so glad someone finally set the record straight
for me.  I had no idea that while the original birth control was liberating,
it still wasn't fair because instead of worrying about not having rampant sex, now
you have to worry about taking a little pill everyday.
</p>
        <p>
Thank God someone came up with a way for a woman to manipulate her body making it
so she doesn't have to take a daily whore pill.  This new birth control makes
it so a woman only has 4 periods a year, instead of the normal 12 to 13 God gave them
naturally.  Never mind that birth control wreaks havoc on hormonal systems and
increases the risk of stroke (good lord).  
</p>
        <p>
I wonder if the rise in HPV (genital warts) has coincided with the increase in use
of birth control.  See, they can spin it any way they'd like, but women can also
avoid pregnancy by just not having sex.  It turns out to be a pretty good way
to avoid sexually transmitted diseases as well.  
</p>
        <p>
I just don't want to hear someone bitching about having to take a pill every day so
they don't get preggers when they probably shouldn't be ho-ing around to begin with. 
And for the love of all that's good, if you are going to ho around, at least have
the dude wear a raincoat.  Otherwise, you'll love having your STD too.
</p>
        <p>
Basically, it boils down to keeping your mouth closed and your legs shut.
</p>
        <p>
          <em>
            <u>I <strong>Sure</strong> don't want to see your armpits - ever</u>
          </em>
        </p>
        <p>
This one's quick.  If I was a taxi driver and you hailed me, and then got in
my face to tell me smugly "I'd rather walk"…I'd run your skinny butt over.  I
bet this girl probably thinks she's smarter than her parents.  She's probably
got HPV, Herpes, and doesn't give her boyfriend any play so he's on Cialis and Enzyte. 
I bet she gripes endlessly about how unfair birth control is.  I'm <strong>Sure</strong> I'd
like to slap her senseless along with ad exec who thought this commercial was a good
idea.<br /></p>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=1f86d206-5fa4-42ca-bb78-881801f72740" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The past month...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/07/25/ThePastMonth.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,d1bd1597-9f49-44bc-8da8-9fcd00ffd23c.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-07-25T08:06:27.2-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-25T08:06:27.200055-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <category term="General" label="General" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,General.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
...has been awesome.  I can't believe it has been so long since I made an entry. 
A lot has happened since my last post but the main thing is <u>I'M A DAD</u>, so hopefully
you can forgive the absense of posts.  I've only had a couple of sleepless nights
and we've mostly offset that by sleeping during the day.  I've been off work
since the July 14th and won't have to return until August 4th thanks to my very awesome
boss.
</p>
        <p>
We were in the hospital for almost a week and for two days of that stay or so, I was
taking care of my wife and baby instead of just helping with the baby.  While
it shouldn't come as a surprise, it never fails how things don't work out the way
we expect them to.  We got home and I went back out for Elizabeth's pain medications,
and fell asleep twice on the way home.  That's when I decided I had to either
crash in bed or I'd wind up crashing into something.
</p>
        <p>
I went to walmart yesterday.  I can't believe it but I've only had 1 bad experience
with walmart out of 5 trips.  This is starting to confirm my suspicion that I'm
letting a few bad experiences (plus my time employed with them) ruin my feelings about
walmart.  Maybe they've taken steps to improve their customer service in this
economic downturn.  I'm calling it Craig 4, Walmart Experience 1.
</p>
        <p>
My son will be 2 weeks old on Sunday.  Wow time is flying.
</p>
        <p>
 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=d1bd1597-9f49-44bc-8da8-9fcd00ffd23c" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trapped beside the wall of meat</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/29/TrappedBesideTheWallOfMeat.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,6b2ce61b-b65a-4b6c-9725-d30da0eee9dd.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-29T10:02:00.703-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T10:21:44.25-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I went to wal-mart this evening for groceries.  For the most part it was very
uneventful, but I got lucky because the cashier closed her line after I'd already
unloaded my groceries on the belt so everyone else behind me had to find another line. 
That's at least 5 for the Walmart Experience, but that's also 5 for me since I didn't
get screwed in the process.  That's a wash for a total of +0.
</p>
        <p>
One minor thing that did annoy me a little but really wasn't such a big deal
is they started restocking efforts at about 8:00 pm.  That means they drag all
the pallets to the big aisles and work off the pallets to deliver food to the shelves. 
This had the unfortunate effect of trapping customers along the wall of meat with
no way to get back to the regular food aisles - since they blocked every single opening.
</p>
        <p>
Now, I fully understand the need to have adequately stocked shelves.  I also
realize Wal-mart is a 24 hour store, and never has a "closed" timeframe to restock
like other grocery stores.  What I can't figure out is why they wouldn't shift
restocking to hours when there are fewer customers in the store - say between midnight
and 6:00 am.  I mean, if you've got to be open anyway, why not take advantage
of the lull in the crowd and do your stocking when you won't inconvenience customers.
</p>
        <p>
Again, it's just poor management.  My wife was with me and that helped make it
not so annoying that it ruined my trip - it was just an observation.  Craig
3, Walmart 1.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=6b2ce61b-b65a-4b6c-9725-d30da0eee9dd" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>1 out of 3 ain't bad...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/27/1OutOf3AintBad.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,06468b1b-1466-4a15-89d9-df6d56471b72.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-26T22:27:19.202-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-27T10:07:15.6133376-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Politics" label="Politics" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,Politics.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div class="PlainText">I'm a political junky.  Everyone knows I love a good political
debate.  I'm facinated by constitutional law and how the different political
groups interpret the constitution and leverage talking points to rope in the electorate. 
I like following the major issues to the supreme court, because I'm always amazed
at how they arrive at their decisions.
</div>
        <div class="PlainText"> 
</div>
        <div class="PlainText">Exxon managed to avoid most of the punative damages they had
to pay by stringing the appeals so far along, the court finally had enough conservative
and moderate leaning conservative judges to rule punative damages can't exceed compensatory
damages.  Do I agree in concept?  Yeah, I guess that makes sense, but I
sure hate to see Exxon catching a break.  I'm sure they didn't intentionally
set out to ruin miles of alaskan coastline and kill so many animals, but that's where
negligence comes in.  Exxon should probably have just paid it and got it over
with.  I can't see this is getting them any points in the public arena.
</div>
        <div class="PlainText"> 
</div>
        <div class="PlainText">------------
</div>
        <div class="PlainText"> 
</div>
        <div class="PlainText">
          <div dir="ltr" align="left">
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">I
can't believe they struck down death penalty in cases of child rape because it can't
be applied in cases where no death occurred.  I have a real problem with the
argument primarily because once you give an example of a crime in which there was
no death victim but the death penalty is appropriate, you automatically eliminate
the argument it can't be used except in the case of murder.  Espionage and Treason
are crimes against society just like murder, rape, and a host of other ones. 
If those two are punishable by the death penalty, it automatically provides a precedent
for using the penalty as an extreme (but not the norm) for punishment in other crimes.  </font>
            </span>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">Cruel
and unusual can't be a persuasive argument because it's a punishment available in
murder cases as well as treason and espionage.  It would fall under "cruel
and unusual" only if it was particularly torturous or outside the norm.  To me,
rape fits the bill as cruel and unusual, and probably justifies
a harsh (though perfectly legal) punishment. I believe this ruling will
increase the amount of vigilante justice from parents seeking remedy.  </font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div dir="ltr" align="left">
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">
              </font>
            </span> 
</div>
          <div dir="ltr" align="left">
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">The
real problem with the death penalty in child rape is the definition of child rape. 
Does it include statutory rape, such as where a 16 year old male has sex with a 15
year old consenting female?  Is it more warranted in cases of serial rapists
as opposed to "one offs"?</font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div dir="ltr" align="left">
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">
              </font>
            </span> 
</div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">I honestly believe
the death penalty should be available for violent crimes, but only applied when the
burden of proof meets "beyond a <strong>shadow of a</strong> doubt" instead of the
normal "beyond a <strong>reasonble</strong> doubt."  DNA is proving too many
people not guilty to be throwing the death penalty around left and right.</font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">
              </font>
            </span> 
</div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">
                <span class="513100517-25062008">
                  <font color="#000000">I
do find it interesting that both McCain and Obama disagree with this decision. 
It's rare you find a supreme court case where the answer leaves both parties dissatisfied.</font>
                </span>
              </font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
            </span> 
</div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
            </span>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000" size="2">In
the absence of strict sentencing guidelines (and let's not forget who our juries are
comprised of), keeping the death penalty off-limits is probably a safe move -
though they probably should have sent it back to the lower courts to have the sentencing
re-examined based on the state's law.  In truth, if the death penalty was more
available in violent crimes, there'd probably be less of them...which leads me to
the last case.</font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
            </span>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
            </span>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000">
              </font>
            </span> 
</div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000">---------------</font>
            </span>
          </div>
          <div>
            <span class="513100517-25062008">
              <font color="#000000">
              </font>
            </span> 
</div>
          <div>The only case I felt really good about was the <strong>DC v Heller</strong> opinion
which clarified the 2nd Amendment protected an individual right to bear arms not just
connected to a militia but for self defense and for hunting.  Note I didn't say
"created" that right.  The right to self defense exists along with the right
to life.  If I have a right to live, then I should have protections to ensure
that right is not infringed upon.
</div>
          <div> 
</div>
          <div>I think the most interesting part of the ruling was not the right exists,
but the application of the ruling.  The summary of the ruling indicates if a
person (in DC) isn't otherwise unqualified to own a handgun (within the federal guidelines
of mentally ill or a felon), then DC <u>MUST</u> issue a permit.  This portion
of the ruling is the part that's going to affect the most states and people. 
Some states have laws called "may issue" laws, in which the local authorities may
deny a permit or may issue the permit on their whim.  They don't have to find
a reason for disqualification, they may just decide to not issue anymore permits this
year.  Other states (Like the Tarheel State) have "shall issue" laws, where if
you're not disqualified (for the reasons listed above) the local authority (the sheriff)
has to issue you a permit.
</div>
          <div> 
</div>
          <div>This ruling should effectively place all states into a "shall issue" status,
since a qualified person is constitutionally guaranteed the right to a handgun.
</div>
          <div> 
</div>
          <div>My biggest question is:  Can I have a machine gun now?  Since there
was already an opinion that only weapons suitable for use by a militia are protected,
and our military (and national guard) trains with machine guns, doesn't that make
the machine gun a protected class of weapon?
</div>
          <div> 
</div>
          <div>
            <br />
 
</div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=06468b1b-1466-4a15-89d9-df6d56471b72" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>3 trips in as many days...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/25/3TripsInAsManyDays.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,de4bf753-6e49-4872-8bcb-a6fe21364cbd.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-25T16:29:45.921875-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-25T16:29:45.921875-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I didn't realize I'd have so much to write about, but unfortunatly due to some issues
with my 14 year old car and the fact my sick cat was out of wet food, I had to go
to walmart again today.  I had to hunt for a parking spot that wasn't in the
next county, but finally settled on the next county.  
</p>
        <p>
I walked through the doors on the side closest to the automotive section (not the
tire and lube entrance though) and tried to grab a cart...except they were all covered
in something resembling filth.  I say resembling filth because I think filth
was cleaner than what was on the carts.  The carts that weren't covered in what
my wife and I refer to as "Fung" were all taunting me with their lopsided baskets
and their broken, free-spinning wheels.
</p>
        <p>
I finally found an acceptable cart and got my shopping done.  Except for an occasional
customer who plows through an intersection without checking to see who's coming, there
were no incidents.  I approached the checkouts closest to my exit, but lo and
behold - ONLY THE SELF CHECKOUTS WERE OPEN.  That's right...no staffed checkout
lanes to accomidate the people who can't handle the admittedly sometimes cantankerous
technology.  The lines were naturally backed up to the merchandise aisles with
customers pushing full carts trying to use the self checkouts.  I started walking...
</p>
        <p>
Midway to the other entrance, I found a single cashier in the cigarrette section who
was checking out about 6 customers each with full carts...I kept walking.
</p>
        <p>
The other entrance was no different, except there were no people here.  There
were plenty of self checkout lanes available, but I guess I just happened to find
it empty.  It just goes to show you that adopting the herd mentality and falling
in line behind others doesn't pay off.  Actually, I'm thinking that normally
leads to a slaughterhouse...
</p>
        <p>
Anyway, once I found the open checkout spot it was smooth sailing.  I don't understand
walmart sometimes.  Why would they let customers endure long lines when other
checkouts were available at the other end of the store?  Why would you have a
total of 1 cashier on duty, and then only in the cigarrette section when you obviously
have enough business - judging from the full parking lot - to justify having
3 or 4 more?
</p>
        <p>
Was I terribly inconvenienced...no.  Did I wind up annoyed?  Well, from
what you've read, you already know the answer is a resounding yes.  Nasty, broken
carts + inadequate staffing + dumb customers + dodgy technology = +1 for Walmart Experience.
</p>
        <p>
Craig 2, Walmart Experience 1
</p>
        <p>
Tomorrow, they're supposed to release the opinion on the 2nd Amendment so I'll be
posting some thoughts on a couple of interesting Supreme Court cases I've been
watching. 
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=de4bf753-6e49-4872-8bcb-a6fe21364cbd" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It's warm outside</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/24/ItsWarmOutside.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,2588fe53-9d32-456a-ab87-3e5bb3e8f0a4.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-24T12:56:28.656-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-24T12:57:52.515625-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I walked down to Wal-mart today on my lunch
break with my friend from work.  I returned a pair of jeans I bought a couple
of weeks ago, which counts as interacting with the Wal-mart Experience Engine. 
The return was quick and easy, despite not having a receipt.  There was initially
a bit of a line, but someone noticed a line was stacking up and came up to the Customer
Service Desk and broke the line down quickly.  They put the return money on a
wal-mart gift card (perfectly acceptable since I didn't have my receipt) and I was
on my way.<br /><br />
Craig 2, Wal-mart Experience 0<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=2588fe53-9d32-456a-ab87-3e5bb3e8f0a4" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Feature:  "Craig vs. the Wal-mart Experience"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/23/NewFeatureCraigVsTheWalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,0580e329-03ef-4377-82f0-30b0e6ba52cb.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-23T13:45:46.796-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-24T12:58:04.34375-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Wal-mart Experience" label="Wal-mart Experience" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,WalmartExperience.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">People who've followed my <a href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/Trackback.aspx?guid=861455cf-e7be-40e3-94a0-2aa3505491bd">blog </a>(or
my conversations) know that I despise going to Wal-mart and would gladly choose Target
whenever possible.  I've always stated "I'd rather pay a few pennies more at
Target than have to deal with Wal-mart raising my blood pressure".<br /><br />
Unfortunatly, I don't live near a Target, and I can walk from my job to a Wal-mart
during my lunch break so I find myself going to Wal-mart more often than I'd care
to admit.  This got me thinking today - do I really hate Wal-mart that much,
or am I letting a few bad experiences color my impression.  Surely I've had bad
experiences with Target too?  Plus, with a baby on the way I'm going to probably
start paying more attention to "a few pennies more".<br /><br />
Starting today, I'll be running a new feature called "Craig vs. the Walmart Experience". 
It works like this:<br /><br />
Each time I go to Wal-mart, I'll write a brief entry on what, if anything, made my
visit annoying or pleasant.  If I have a positive experience, that's 1 for me. 
If I have a negative experience, that's 1 for the Walmart Experience.  
<br /><br />
Please note, I'm not tracking whether Wal-mart is bad.   There are so many
factors involved that I can't possibly comment about how bad Wal-mart is, except for
when I worked at the one in Greenville...that was too bizarre.  I believe the
Wal-mart Experience is a perfect storm of dumb customers, unmotivated employees, and
insufficient staffing.  It has little to do with Wal-mart as a juggernaut, and
much more to do with how individual stores are managed based on the guidance given
to them by their home office.<br /><br />
I wanted to start today because, much like in windows solitare, I wanted to save my
score while I was up.  Today's trip was pleasant because it was entirely uneventful. 
I went through the self-checkout with a handful of items, I didn't have to stand in
line because most of the other people were using the properly staffed checkout lanes,
and there was no struggle with the self-checkout computer to get out of the store
as intended.<br /><br />
Today's score Craig 1, Walmart Experience 0<br /><br />
I'm adding a link in the navigation section which will link back to this post. 
The link will keep the running total, but for newcomers, they can click on the link
to refer back to this post, where they'll find the rules and explanation.  I
plan on running this for at least a year.  I believe I'll find justification
for not going to Wal-mart anymore, but I hope I'll be pleasantly surprised.<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=0580e329-03ef-4377-82f0-30b0e6ba52cb" /></div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Right topic, wrong spin</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/22/RightTopicWrongSpin.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,29845156-d326-4b38-af24-bef41b55f066.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-22T10:43:44.562-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-25T16:30:34.34375-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Politics" label="Politics" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,Politics.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I was just reading this article on msnbc:  <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25311529/">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25311529/</a>,
and from the start thought the writer is living in la-la land.  The premise is
the american "can do" attitude is under assault by outside forces beyond our control. 
The truth is, our american ingenuity is under assault by forces from within - which are completly under
our control, but we've chosen to do nothing about.
</p>
        <p>
We've had a two party system for so long, we've forgotten how to put anyone else into
power.  The two major parties have worked their magic to practically guarantee
several things:  1) No other political party is going to get enough face time
to gather traction, 2) People are too distracted by "ideological" differences
to realize both parties are almost exactly the same, and 3) the american people are
divided enough that absolutely nothing of any value can get through congress except
spending more money in the guise of bolstering "american interests".  
</p>
        <p>
The major thing eroding american "can-do" is the millions of americans who <strong><u>won't
do</u></strong> much of anything.  You can't keep going when most of
the people are living off the rest of us.  This is going to get much
worse when the baby boomers do retire and finally crush the social security and medicare
systems.  The truth is, the US government is such a mess, there may not be any
way to fix it.  I've been hearing several musicians suggest maybe it's time to
start over...
</p>
        <p>
Before you say "well, those guys are just hippies", bear in mind it was the hippies
that pretty much started a revolution back in the 60s and are currently ruining the
country now.  They've already destroyed our country's values, why not destroy
our value as well.
</p>
        <p>
It's no wonder people are feeling like they can't do it anymore.  Our leaders
have placed this country in a position where we rely on them for everything. 
The sad part is, we've done it to ourselves.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=29845156-d326-4b38-af24-bef41b55f066" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sick again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/2008/06/09/SickAgain.aspx" />
    <id>http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/PermaLink,guid,48ad580b-1824-4da3-b628-b7b5cd46a54e.aspx</id>
    <published>2008-06-09T12:55:48.615-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-25T16:32:00.90625-04:00</updated>
    <category term="Bodily Harm" label="Bodily Harm" scheme="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/CategoryView,category,BodilyHarm.aspx" />
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
My mother-in-law discovered a pattern.  Everytime I go away for an extended period
and work long hours, I get sick.  I've never really thought of myself as a sickly
person, but since I've been at ITS, it seems like I get sick frequently and it always
seems to coincide with long work weeks and strange sleep schedules.
</p>
        <p>
Some of you may remember around Christmas when I almost cancelled the Christmas party
due to nausea, diarrhea, and slight fever.  Fortunatly, that wound up being an
18 hour thing that passed and no one else got sick so I'm guessing my immune system
just can't take the lack of sleep.
</p>
        <p>
I wonder what's more frustrating for my wife, having me gone for days on end, or having
me around the house sick?  I'm sure it's no fun being around someone who is constantly
complaining about not feeling good.  I won't even let her give me a smooch since
she's less than 4 weeks from D-Day (Delivery Day) and I'd hate for her to get sick
now.
</p>
        <p>
Plus it's freaking hot outside.  I wonder if all the extreme temperature differences
have anything to do with it?  I was in a siberian computer room this past week
and the average temperature was 58F.  Temperatures outside were running high
90s.  I'm sure that probably takes it's toll on your body as well.
</p>
        <p>
Is anyone planning on seeing "The Happening"?  It looks fairly apocalyptic and
I'm all about some end of the world movies.  I know Shane wants to go, and my
wife said she'd like to skip it but has no problem with me going.  "The Happening"
and "The Hulk" are on my to see list before the baby comes.  Any takers?
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://craignet.endoftheinternet.org/craigblog/aggbug.ashx?id=48ad580b-1824-4da3-b628-b7b5cd46a54e" />
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>