# Sunday, June 29, 2008

I went to wal-mart this evening for groceries.  For the most part it was very uneventful, but I got lucky because the cashier closed her line after I'd already unloaded my groceries on the belt so everyone else behind me had to find another line.  That's at least 5 for the Walmart Experience, but that's also 5 for me since I didn't get screwed in the process.  That's a wash for a total of +0.

One minor thing that did annoy me a little but really wasn't such a big deal is they started restocking efforts at about 8:00 pm.  That means they drag all the pallets to the big aisles and work off the pallets to deliver food to the shelves.  This had the unfortunate effect of trapping customers along the wall of meat with no way to get back to the regular food aisles - since they blocked every single opening.

Now, I fully understand the need to have adequately stocked shelves.  I also realize Wal-mart is a 24 hour store, and never has a "closed" timeframe to restock like other grocery stores.  What I can't figure out is why they wouldn't shift restocking to hours when there are fewer customers in the store - say between midnight and 6:00 am.  I mean, if you've got to be open anyway, why not take advantage of the lull in the crowd and do your stocking when you won't inconvenience customers.

Again, it's just poor management.  My wife was with me and that helped make it not so annoying that it ruined my trip - it was just an observation.  Craig 3, Walmart 1.

Sunday, June 29, 2008 9:02:00 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [2]Trackback
# Thursday, June 26, 2008
I'm a political junky.  Everyone knows I love a good political debate.  I'm facinated by constitutional law and how the different political groups interpret the constitution and leverage talking points to rope in the electorate.  I like following the major issues to the supreme court, because I'm always amazed at how they arrive at their decisions.
 
Exxon managed to avoid most of the punative damages they had to pay by stringing the appeals so far along, the court finally had enough conservative and moderate leaning conservative judges to rule punative damages can't exceed compensatory damages.  Do I agree in concept?  Yeah, I guess that makes sense, but I sure hate to see Exxon catching a break.  I'm sure they didn't intentionally set out to ruin miles of alaskan coastline and kill so many animals, but that's where negligence comes in.  Exxon should probably have just paid it and got it over with.  I can't see this is getting them any points in the public arena.
 
------------
 
I can't believe they struck down death penalty in cases of child rape because it can't be applied in cases where no death occurred.  I have a real problem with the argument primarily because once you give an example of a crime in which there was no death victim but the death penalty is appropriate, you automatically eliminate the argument it can't be used except in the case of murder.  Espionage and Treason are crimes against society just like murder, rape, and a host of other ones.  If those two are punishable by the death penalty, it automatically provides a precedent for using the penalty as an extreme (but not the norm) for punishment in other crimes.  Cruel and unusual can't be a persuasive argument because it's a punishment available in murder cases as well as treason and espionage.  It would fall under "cruel and unusual" only if it was particularly torturous or outside the norm.  To me, rape fits the bill as cruel and unusual, and probably justifies a harsh (though perfectly legal) punishment. I believe this ruling will increase the amount of vigilante justice from parents seeking remedy. 
 
The real problem with the death penalty in child rape is the definition of child rape.  Does it include statutory rape, such as where a 16 year old male has sex with a 15 year old consenting female?  Is it more warranted in cases of serial rapists as opposed to "one offs"?
 
I honestly believe the death penalty should be available for violent crimes, but only applied when the burden of proof meets "beyond a shadow of a doubt" instead of the normal "beyond a reasonble doubt."  DNA is proving too many people not guilty to be throwing the death penalty around left and right.
 
I do find it interesting that both McCain and Obama disagree with this decision.  It's rare you find a supreme court case where the answer leaves both parties dissatisfied.
 
In the absence of strict sentencing guidelines (and let's not forget who our juries are comprised of), keeping the death penalty off-limits is probably a safe move - though they probably should have sent it back to the lower courts to have the sentencing re-examined based on the state's law.  In truth, if the death penalty was more available in violent crimes, there'd probably be less of them...which leads me to the last case.
 
---------------
 
The only case I felt really good about was the DC v Heller opinion which clarified the 2nd Amendment protected an individual right to bear arms not just connected to a militia but for self defense and for hunting.  Note I didn't say "created" that right.  The right to self defense exists along with the right to life.  If I have a right to live, then I should have protections to ensure that right is not infringed upon.
 
I think the most interesting part of the ruling was not the right exists, but the application of the ruling.  The summary of the ruling indicates if a person (in DC) isn't otherwise unqualified to own a handgun (within the federal guidelines of mentally ill or a felon), then DC MUST issue a permit.  This portion of the ruling is the part that's going to affect the most states and people.  Some states have laws called "may issue" laws, in which the local authorities may deny a permit or may issue the permit on their whim.  They don't have to find a reason for disqualification, they may just decide to not issue anymore permits this year.  Other states (Like the Tarheel State) have "shall issue" laws, where if you're not disqualified (for the reasons listed above) the local authority (the sheriff) has to issue you a permit.
 
This ruling should effectively place all states into a "shall issue" status, since a qualified person is constitutionally guaranteed the right to a handgun.
 
My biggest question is:  Can I have a machine gun now?  Since there was already an opinion that only weapons suitable for use by a militia are protected, and our military (and national guard) trains with machine guns, doesn't that make the machine gun a protected class of weapon?
 

 
Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:27:19 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [0]Trackback
# Wednesday, June 25, 2008

I didn't realize I'd have so much to write about, but unfortunatly due to some issues with my 14 year old car and the fact my sick cat was out of wet food, I had to go to walmart again today.  I had to hunt for a parking spot that wasn't in the next county, but finally settled on the next county. 

I walked through the doors on the side closest to the automotive section (not the tire and lube entrance though) and tried to grab a cart...except they were all covered in something resembling filth.  I say resembling filth because I think filth was cleaner than what was on the carts.  The carts that weren't covered in what my wife and I refer to as "Fung" were all taunting me with their lopsided baskets and their broken, free-spinning wheels.

I finally found an acceptable cart and got my shopping done.  Except for an occasional customer who plows through an intersection without checking to see who's coming, there were no incidents.  I approached the checkouts closest to my exit, but lo and behold - ONLY THE SELF CHECKOUTS WERE OPEN.  That's right...no staffed checkout lanes to accomidate the people who can't handle the admittedly sometimes cantankerous technology.  The lines were naturally backed up to the merchandise aisles with customers pushing full carts trying to use the self checkouts.  I started walking...

Midway to the other entrance, I found a single cashier in the cigarrette section who was checking out about 6 customers each with full carts...I kept walking.

The other entrance was no different, except there were no people here.  There were plenty of self checkout lanes available, but I guess I just happened to find it empty.  It just goes to show you that adopting the herd mentality and falling in line behind others doesn't pay off.  Actually, I'm thinking that normally leads to a slaughterhouse...

Anyway, once I found the open checkout spot it was smooth sailing.  I don't understand walmart sometimes.  Why would they let customers endure long lines when other checkouts were available at the other end of the store?  Why would you have a total of 1 cashier on duty, and then only in the cigarrette section when you obviously have enough business - judging from the full parking lot - to justify having 3 or 4 more?

Was I terribly inconvenienced...no.  Did I wind up annoyed?  Well, from what you've read, you already know the answer is a resounding yes.  Nasty, broken carts + inadequate staffing + dumb customers + dodgy technology = +1 for Walmart Experience.

Craig 2, Walmart Experience 1

Tomorrow, they're supposed to release the opinion on the 2nd Amendment so I'll be posting some thoughts on a couple of interesting Supreme Court cases I've been watching. 

Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:29:45 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [0]Trackback
# Tuesday, June 24, 2008
I walked down to Wal-mart today on my lunch break with my friend from work.  I returned a pair of jeans I bought a couple of weeks ago, which counts as interacting with the Wal-mart Experience Engine.  The return was quick and easy, despite not having a receipt.  There was initially a bit of a line, but someone noticed a line was stacking up and came up to the Customer Service Desk and broke the line down quickly.  They put the return money on a wal-mart gift card (perfectly acceptable since I didn't have my receipt) and I was on my way.

Craig 2, Wal-mart Experience 0

Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:56:28 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [0]Trackback
# Monday, June 23, 2008
People who've followed my blog (or my conversations) know that I despise going to Wal-mart and would gladly choose Target whenever possible.  I've always stated "I'd rather pay a few pennies more at Target than have to deal with Wal-mart raising my blood pressure".

Unfortunatly, I don't live near a Target, and I can walk from my job to a Wal-mart during my lunch break so I find myself going to Wal-mart more often than I'd care to admit.  This got me thinking today - do I really hate Wal-mart that much, or am I letting a few bad experiences color my impression.  Surely I've had bad experiences with Target too?  Plus, with a baby on the way I'm going to probably start paying more attention to "a few pennies more".

Starting today, I'll be running a new feature called "Craig vs. the Walmart Experience".  It works like this:

Each time I go to Wal-mart, I'll write a brief entry on what, if anything, made my visit annoying or pleasant.  If I have a positive experience, that's 1 for me.  If I have a negative experience, that's 1 for the Walmart Experience. 

Please note, I'm not tracking whether Wal-mart is bad.   There are so many factors involved that I can't possibly comment about how bad Wal-mart is, except for when I worked at the one in Greenville...that was too bizarre.  I believe the Wal-mart Experience is a perfect storm of dumb customers, unmotivated employees, and insufficient staffing.  It has little to do with Wal-mart as a juggernaut, and much more to do with how individual stores are managed based on the guidance given to them by their home office.

I wanted to start today because, much like in windows solitare, I wanted to save my score while I was up.  Today's trip was pleasant because it was entirely uneventful.  I went through the self-checkout with a handful of items, I didn't have to stand in line because most of the other people were using the properly staffed checkout lanes, and there was no struggle with the self-checkout computer to get out of the store as intended.

Today's score Craig 1, Walmart Experience 0

I'm adding a link in the navigation section which will link back to this post.  The link will keep the running total, but for newcomers, they can click on the link to refer back to this post, where they'll find the rules and explanation.  I plan on running this for at least a year.  I believe I'll find justification for not going to Wal-mart anymore, but I hope I'll be pleasantly surprised.

Monday, June 23, 2008 12:45:46 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [0]Trackback
Search